Why is Obama purging senior military leaders?
This is the answer an Army Colonel gave,
Most
branches of the service routinely engage in war “games” and come up
with strategies and tactics on how to handle every type of military
conflict and scenario that can be imagined. One of the big new battle
scenarios being actively discussed in the military recently is how to
handle civil unrest in the U.S. and fighting in the streets. What will
the Army do if called in to fight armed civilians in the streets of the
United States? How will that urban warfare be conducted? Will troops
be able to fire upon other American citizens when they have taken an
oath to protect American citizens?
Many
in the military are discussing the very real possibility that Obama
will attempt to stay in office beyond two terms. It's speculated that
Obama will do this by declaring a state of martial law. The easiest way
to declare martial law is when there is massive civil unrest and riots
throughout the U.S. Thus, it is believed that Obama, and his regime,
will intentionally create a situation of massive civil unrest. Some
believe he has already started to implement that strategy by forcing
Obamacare on everyone (when the populace did not ask for it and less
than 300 people in power voted for it). Perhaps the Administration is
not too concerned over the totally dysfunctional Obamacare website and
the additional fact that millions will be dropped from their existing
insurance policies which they already had and liked. The Administration
may not care if getting health care becomes more difficult and more
expensive because it is all leading toward civil unrest. It is believed
by some that Obamacare will only get worse and worse, and then in 2 to 3
years when people have a very difficult time getting medical treatment
for themselves or their loved ones, people will be enraged.
Moreover,
it is being speculated that around the same time when the frustration
levels over Obamacare are hitting a critical point in 2 to 3 years,
there will be a “glitch” in the welfare payment (or EBT) payment
system. The tens of millions who rely on EBT handouts to sustain
themselves will be cut off. The overwhelming majority of the EBT
recipients are Black. The Obama regime will then blame the “glitch” on
the Republicans who froze government spending which “forced” Obama to
suspension of EBT payments. (Obama will intentionally drive spending up
and up uncontrolled knowing full well that one day the Republicans will
be backed into a corner and finally vote for a freeze in spending.)
Obama will create heightened racial tension by telling everyone that the
White Republicans are racially motivated and did this to hurt the Black
community. This manufactured racial tension, combined with growing
tensions over the then-collapsing medical coverage due to Obamacare,
will result in race wars and civil unrest. People will take to the
streets.
By
the way, the Army Colonel, who is telling saying this, is Black. He
specifically commented, and outwardly expressed his embarrassment, about
how Blacks have become so dependent and enslaved by the welfare system
and the Democrats that it would be very easy to create civil unrest and
race wars merely by cutting off, or dramatically hindering, EBT payments
for only a month or so. He believes that most Blacks, who have a
misguided sense of entitlement, will then take to looting stores and
rioting.
Once
the race wars, civil unrest, and violence becomes pervasive throughout
the U.S., Obama will declare martial law and take over. Elections can,
and will, be postponed under martial law.
The
colonel noted that this possibility is clearly being analyzed and
discussed inside the military because such a martial law strategy is
nothing new. Tyrannical and dictatorial leaders in the past have done
the martial law strategy many times. He noted that dictators such as
Stalin, Mussolini, and Hitler did basically the same thing. He went on
to say that one of the most recent examples of this strategy was when
Marcos declared martial law in the Philippines from 1972-1981 due to
civil unrest. The Philippines had democratic elections up until that
time. When martial law was declared, the Philippine constitution was
suspended, its Congress dissolved, all elections were suspended, and
Marcos remained in power for years beyond his elected term. The alleged
“terrorist bombings” that occurred in the Philippines, which lead to
Marcos declaring martial law, have always been questioned and never
proven to be the acts of actual terrorists.
He
concluded by saying that many believe this is the real reason behind
the purgings of military generals. The older members of the military,
and especially its generals and leaders, tend to be more conservative
and they believe in the Constitution - and following the Constitution.
Thus, a tyrant and dictator needs to get rid of these military leaders
before a state of martial law is declared if the rising dictator wants
the military to follow along and do what the dictator says. Due to the
loss of many experienced military leaders the past few years, the
military is now being run and guided more and more by younger,
inexperienced leaders. The type who won’t really know what to do if
martial law was declared. Moreover, he noted that there is a growing
mind-set throughout the military now that every soldier needs to keep
quiet and just follow along with what Obama says and wants to do or you
will be fired and your military career ruined. Again, I was told this
is nothing new since removing strong military leaders in advance of
declaring martial law is a historically-proven element of a rising
tyrant and dictator.
3 comments:
Not sure about all of this thread but he is working to remove the road blocks to serving a third term.
A reader sent the following comment directly, after experiencing difficulty trying to post it.
"Gus,
You should really think about posting something from an unknown source and stating that it seemed "absolutely reasonable". And your comment stating " Keep buying ammo,guys" was pushing inflammatory.
I am very disappointed in you and I am embarrassed that such a blog post would come from within our County. We deserve better.
If you read the Consitution, there is no provision for its being suspended by the President. Period. None. Nada.
Irrespective of "Martial Law" there is no Constitutional power for the president to dissolve Congress. Period. None. Nada.
There is posse comitatus which prohibits the military from law en forcement, except under specific circumstances. One of which requires that the state request military assistance. See
article 4 Section 4 of the Constitution.
I lived through the race riots of the 60's. Armed troops (National Guard and US Army) were used to put them down, Like they were during the LA Rodney King riots.
The Constitution was not revoked during any of these. People arrested for looting and mayhem were tried under *civil* criminal law, not the UCMJ.
Mayor Nagin of New Orleans tried to suspend the Constitution after Katrina - and got his head handed to him as a result. I doubt any other mayor will ever try that again.
Would the military fire on US citizens? According to a mid 90's study of US Marine officers at 29 Palms, 75% of them would refuse to fire on Americans for refusing to turn in their guns. These are the officers coming reaching general officer level today.
I believe that the Oath is of such power and tradition, that it won't matter how many generals Obama appoints, America's military will be loyal to the Constitution and not Obama if the STHF. I believe that any role played by the military in Obama-instigated riots will be sharply limited and narrowly focused.
This anecdotal comment an IOWA paper by an Iowa National Guardsman is probably more indicative of reality than your anonymous email Col.
"The Iowa National guard did a training exercise in a small town to "clear" an abandoned building... next to a gun store... through rumor the people through we had come to close the gun store and take the guns... needless to say we where very quickly outnumbered and outgunned as we quickly explained we swore and oath defend the constitution and we have the right to disobey any "Unlawful" order that conflicts with it. So if you plan to declare war on the public brace yourself because it will be ugly. You do not have people on your side."
Pasted from http://carrollspaper.com/main.asp?SectionID=1&SubSectionID=1&ArticleID=14934&TM=35600.75
Post a Comment