Sunday, January 19, 2014

Why is Obama purging senior military leaders?

I received this by email today. I don't know the source. This seems absolutely reasonable to me, based on what Obama is doing to this once-great country. Keep buying ammo, guys.

Why is Obama purging senior military leaders?

This is the answer an Army Colonel gave,

Most branches of the service routinely engage in war “games” and come up with strategies and tactics on how to handle every type of military conflict and scenario that can be imagined.  One of the big new battle scenarios being actively discussed in the military recently is how to handle civil unrest in the U.S. and fighting in the streets.  What will the Army do if called in to fight armed civilians in the streets of the United States?  How will that urban warfare be conducted?  Will troops be able to fire upon other American citizens when they have taken an oath to protect American citizens?

Many in the military are discussing the very real possibility that Obama will attempt to stay in office beyond two terms.  It's speculated that Obama will do this by declaring a state of martial law.  The easiest way to declare martial law is when there is massive civil unrest and riots throughout the U.S.  Thus, it is believed that Obama, and his regime, will intentionally create a situation of massive civil unrest.  Some believe he has already started to implement that strategy by forcing Obamacare on everyone (when the populace did not ask for it and less than 300 people in power voted for it). Perhaps the Administration is not too concerned over the totally dysfunctional Obamacare website and the additional fact that millions will be dropped from their existing insurance policies which they already had and liked.  The Administration may not care if getting health care becomes more difficult and more expensive because it is all leading toward civil unrest.  It is believed by some that Obamacare will only get worse and worse, and then in 2 to 3 years when people have a very difficult time getting medical treatment for themselves or their loved ones, people will be enraged.

Moreover, it is being speculated that around the same time when the frustration levels over Obamacare are hitting a critical point in 2 to 3 years, there will be a “glitch” in the welfare payment (or EBT) payment system.  The tens of millions who rely on EBT handouts to sustain themselves will be cut off.  The overwhelming majority of the EBT recipients are Black.  The Obama regime will then blame the “glitch” on the Republicans who froze government spending which “forced” Obama to suspension of EBT payments. (Obama will intentionally drive spending up and up uncontrolled knowing full well that one day the Republicans will be backed into a corner and finally vote for a freeze in spending.) Obama will create heightened racial tension by telling everyone that the White Republicans are racially motivated and did this to hurt the Black community.  This manufactured racial tension, combined with  growing tensions over the then-collapsing medical coverage due to Obamacare, will result in race wars and civil unrest.  People will take to the streets.

By the way, the Army Colonel, who is telling saying this, is Black.  He specifically commented, and outwardly expressed his embarrassment, about how Blacks have become so dependent and enslaved by the welfare system and the Democrats that it would be very easy to create civil unrest and race wars merely by cutting off, or dramatically hindering, EBT payments for only a month or so.  He believes that most Blacks, who have a misguided sense of entitlement, will then take to looting stores and rioting.

Once the race wars, civil unrest, and violence becomes pervasive throughout the U.S., Obama will declare martial law and take over.  Elections can, and will, be postponed under martial law.

The colonel noted that this possibility is clearly being analyzed and discussed inside the military because such a martial law strategy is nothing new.  Tyrannical and dictatorial leaders in the past have done the martial law strategy many times.  He noted that dictators such as Stalin, Mussolini, and Hitler did basically the same thing.  He went on to say that one of the most recent examples of this strategy was when Marcos declared martial law in the Philippines from 1972-1981 due to civil unrest.  The Philippines had democratic elections up until that time.  When martial law was declared, the Philippine constitution was suspended, its Congress dissolved, all elections were suspended, and Marcos remained in power for years beyond his elected term. The alleged “terrorist bombings” that occurred in the Philippines, which lead to Marcos declaring martial law, have always been questioned and never proven to be the acts of actual terrorists.

He concluded by saying that many believe this is the real reason behind the purgings of military generals.  The older members of the military, and especially its generals and leaders, tend to be more conservative and they believe in the Constitution - and following the Constitution.  Thus, a tyrant and dictator needs to get rid of these military leaders before a state of martial law is declared if the rising dictator wants the military to follow along and do what the dictator says.  Due to the loss of many experienced military leaders the past few years, the military is now being run and guided more and more by younger, inexperienced leaders. The type who won’t really know what to do if martial law was declared.  Moreover, he noted that there is a growing mind-set throughout the military now that every soldier needs to keep quiet and just follow along with what Obama says and wants to do or you will be fired and your military career ruined.  Again, I was told this is nothing new since removing strong military leaders in advance of declaring martial law is a historically-proven element of a rising tyrant and dictator.

3 comments:

Big Daddy said...

Not sure about all of this thread but he is working to remove the road blocks to serving a third term.

Gus said...

A reader sent the following comment directly, after experiencing difficulty trying to post it.

"Gus,
You should really think about posting something from an unknown source and stating that it seemed "absolutely reasonable". And your comment stating " Keep buying ammo,guys" was pushing inflammatory.
I am very disappointed in you and I am embarrassed that such a blog post would come from within our County. We deserve better.

Clem Kadiddlehopper said...

If you read the Consitution, there is no provision for its being suspended by the President. Period. None. Nada.

Irrespective of "Martial Law" there is no Constitutional power for the president to dissolve Congress. Period. None. Nada.

There is posse comitatus which prohibits the military from law en forcement, except under specific circumstances. One of which requires that the state request military assistance. See
article 4 Section 4 of the Constitution.

I lived through the race riots of the 60's. Armed troops (National Guard and US Army) were used to put them down, Like they were during the LA Rodney King riots.

The Constitution was not revoked during any of these. People arrested for looting and mayhem were tried under *civil* criminal law, not the UCMJ.

Mayor Nagin of New Orleans tried to suspend the Constitution after Katrina - and got his head handed to him as a result. I doubt any other mayor will ever try that again.

Would the military fire on US citizens? According to a mid 90's study of US Marine officers at 29 Palms, 75% of them would refuse to fire on Americans for refusing to turn in their guns. These are the officers coming reaching general officer level today.

I believe that the Oath is of such power and tradition, that it won't matter how many generals Obama appoints, America's military will be loyal to the Constitution and not Obama if the STHF. I believe that any role played by the military in Obama-instigated riots will be sharply limited and narrowly focused.

This anecdotal comment an IOWA paper by an Iowa National Guardsman is probably more indicative of reality than your anonymous email Col.

"The Iowa National guard did a training exercise in a small town to "clear" an abandoned building... next to a gun store... through rumor the people through we had come to close the gun store and take the guns... needless to say we where very quickly outnumbered and outgunned as we quickly explained we swore and oath defend the constitution and we have the right to disobey any "Unlawful" order that conflicts with it. So if you plan to declare war on the public brace yourself because it will be ugly. You do not have people on your side."

Pasted from http://carrollspaper.com/main.asp?SectionID=1&SubSectionID=1&ArticleID=14934&TM=35600.75