Friday, August 31, 2012

Say No to U.N. gun ban

The National Association for Gun Rights warns readers and U.S. citizens that Hillary Clinton, the 67th Secretary of State of the United States, favors the full-scale gun ban to be proposed on September 7th at the United Nations' Programme Against Small Arms meeting being held right now on our own soil in New York City.

I wonder... Did she flunk Constitutional History in high school? Has Hillary read the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution? Isn't she sworn to uphold the Constitution of the United States?

She may be willing to give her her own rights (she probably has armed protection at our expense), but my rights under the Second Amendment are not going to be surrendered.

Bye-bye, Hillary. You'll be unemployed, come Jan. 20. Press your Congressional representatives right now to lean on Pres. Obama to tell Hillary to pull in her fangs.

4 comments:

bill Matteson said...

I wrote an article very similar to this and sent it to the NWH letters to the editor they sent it back because snopes said it wasn't true

since when does a newspaper verify articles or happenings via snopes which we all know is Left wing funded

I sent back to the NWH verification of the UN meetings but they never responded

Joseph Monack said...

Since it's a UN Treaty doesn't that mean Congress doesn't ratify it? I'm not too sure about the structure of the UN but I'm pretty sure if there's a treaty signed at the UN it was signed with less representation (or perhaps none) than a normal bill or Amendment would require.

Gus said...

As I understand it, the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution would have to be changed, before the U.N. ban would take effect in the U.S. Would that happen? Could it happen? If too few people pay attention and act, it could happen. Just like Hitler was able to take over Germany.

"The price of freedom is eternal vigilance."

Joseph Monack said...

Oh, well if the Second Amendment would have to be changed I would have to say no it couldn't happen. The majority of states are red states. I don't think it's politically possible but you're right that more people need to pay attention.
Katherine Schultz sent me a letter after one of the elections that said voter turnout for that election was 12.55 percent. That's of *registered voters too. Then ask how many people are registered. Then ask how many people who are voting even know what the heck is going on. It's pretty sad.