Saturday, December 28, 2013

Amnesty - Obama's Top 2014 Priority?

Is it really true that Obama's top priority in 2014 is to pass an Amnesty Bill?

I oppose this. There are millions who want to come to the U.S. legally. Why should the U.S. allow those who came here illegally to be able to stay here? Or, for that matter, those who came here but over-stayed their visas, and thereby became illegal aliens.

What part if ILLEGAL is the President of the United States, a lawyer himself, unwilling to understand and accept? He swore to uphold the Constitution and the laws, didn't he?

The People of the United States must get across to their Senators and Representatives that this president is out of control. He is violating his sworn oath and endangering the future of the United States.

In 2010 I helped an African student get out of McHenry County Jail. He had violated the terms of his student visa and had been scooped up by ICE. His parents finally collected $3,500 for his bond and I took it to the Immigration Court and posted it for him, so that he could be released. He was supposed to get back in school. He didn't.

In April a judge told him to clear out by July 31. He chose to stop communicating with me. I don't know if he left the USA or not. ICE will now consider the Bond as breached and forfeited to the U.S. Government and will issue a warrant for him.

It looks to me like he has cost his parents the $3,500, and life will likely not be much fun the next time he gets picked up, if he is still in the U.S.

Looking back, the Court should have put him on a much shorter leash, and it should have required some reporting and proof that he was back in school.

Prim campaign: Zinke bails on debate

The following press release has been issued by the campaign of Bill Prim for McHenry County Sheriff:



PRIM CALLS ZINKE DEBATE PULLOUT “FEEBLE,”
SAYS VOTERS ARE THE LOSERS

Republican candidate for Sheriff Bill Prim Saturday called Andrew Zinke’s decision to pull out of the only scheduled debate a decision that denies the people of McHenry County a chance to weigh for themselves the qualities and abilities of the two candidates.
            “Mr. Zinke has now deprived the voters of an excellent opportunity not only to learn our positions on the issues but to get a sense of the people behind the positions, and how we conduct ourselves in a high-stakes, high-pressure environment.
            “The Sheriff’s Office, and law enforcement in general, is frequently stressful,” Prim added.  “Voters want to see for themselves how a candidate for that office operates when he has to think on his feet and make rapid decisions.  Mr. Zinke has just denied the voters that chance, and that is a feeble showing indeed.”
            The Prim and Zinke campaigns had previously both formally committed to the debate, to take place under the sponsorship of Patriots United.  No other organizations, neither the Northwest Herald newspaper nor the League of Women Voters (both of which have been mentioned as possible debate sponsors), have contacted the Prim campaign regarding a debate before the March 18 primary election.  Either of those groups would be fine with him, Prim said.
            Prim said voters should be on the lookout for Zinke to find scheduling difficulties or other reasons to avoid any other debates.  “Mr. Zinke will have a very hard time defending his decision to give the RITA Corporation, and his political donor, early warning about DEA surveillance of a drug shipment, not to mention the huge budget run-ups in the Sheriff’s Office over the last several years with nothing to show for it.  I expect him to drag his feet regarding debates in order to avoid defending himself on these and other issues.”

MCSD Jail - co-ed now?

What happened last Saturday at the McHenry County Jail (a/k/a McHenry County Correctional Facility)? Normally, male and female inmates are kept segregated But now, it seems, not always.

There is a door between the men's and the women's sections. Naturally, this door is supposed to be closed and locked. Locked, as in closed tightly. Secure. Guards (now called Corrections Officers (COs)) have keys to pass through locked doors. They are supposed to close and lock doors behind them. Supposed to.

It seems that last Saturday a CO passed through such a door and failed to ensure that the door was tightly closed and locked. I mean, this ought to be a no-brainer; right? You close the door and "test" it. You try to turn the knob or lever. You shouldn't be able to pull it open.

But the door didn't lock. This can only mean the the guard failed to check it, after passing through it.

A male inmate was able to open the door, leave the men's section, enter the women's section and proceed to a cell of someone he knew. Let's see; what might a man want to go to a woman's cell for? Particularly, if they were already "pretty well" acquainted? You guessed it.

He didn't do this unobserved. The story is that it was noticed that he had passed through, and it was reported to at least two guards.

What should have happened next? The first guard to whom it was reported should have immediately reported it to his or her supervisor. He or she then should have commenced a search for the man in the women's unit. It shouldn't have been too hard to find the male inmate. It seems his destination was known and reported.

If there were some fear that the male inmate might overpower the CO, then the CO could just slam the cell door and lock both the man and the woman in the woman's cell. I can, of course, think of a reason not to do that: what if the man was there to harm the woman?

Possibly the first guard might have waited for a second before commencing the search. The story that came to me was that 90 minutes passed before a search was initiated. The first two COs did not immediately begin to check out the reports that a male inmate had entered the women's section. What possible reason could they have for not investigating immediately?

Jail supervisors have to know who went through the door and failed to secure it. There is video surveillance of the interior of the jail.

By Thursday no word had reached the outside world. Who would have been informed? Certainly, jail supervisors - those are sergeants. And their lieutenants. And the Deputy Chief in the Jail would have been informed - that's Patrick Firman, And the Chief of the Jail - that's Dan Sedlock. And, of course, the Undersheriff - that's Andy Zinke, who wants to be the next sheriff. And also the Sheriff - that's Keith Nygren, who probably had his cell phone on at some time during the week.

MCSD made a big deal recently of all its certifications; for ex., from the American Correctional Association. Would something like this very important lapse in security be enough for the ACA to yank its accreditation?

Zinke is likely to take a big hit on this one, because it is he who is believed to be running the Sheriff's Department. Zinke is not insulated by the lengthy chain-of-command. Zinke is responsible for everything that happens at the Jail and with the deputies - whether he likes it or not.

Friday, December 27, 2013

Should prostitution be legal?

Check out Cal Skinner's article this morning on McHenry County Blog about the recent problem in Crystal Lake with massage "parlors".

He recites the problems in Crystal Lake, Woodstock, Algonquin and McHenry (City) since 2010, when several places have been shut down as fronts for prostitution. Local police have sent in undercover officers who apparently recognize when they are getting rubbed the wrong way.

I wonder in how many cases a problem of entrapment occurs. What if the customer asks for "more" and, when an additional price is mentioned, offers to pay up. Where does he (or she) hide the handcuffs and badge?

Or is it like the tobacco and alcohol stings at Walgreens, when an under-age kid is trained and sent in by the police, makes an illegal purchase, and then walks out of the store to the cop waiting in his squad car to report the illegal purchase?

With the direction in which many states are going with new laws, is it maybe time to legalize prostitution? What is really the harm, if a customer goes into a business, pays some money for a service and leaves?

The customer is not going in for a "massage". If s/he wants a legitimate massage for.relaxation or therapy or treatment, then he can go to a trained and licensed massage therapist.

At first, I thought McHenry County Blog might be supporting legalized prostitution in its sentence, "The Cities of Crystal Lake and McHenry, Villages of Algonquin and Woodstock, because of their Home Rule status, could license the parlors and make them subject to spot inspection." (Note: Woodstock is not home-rule)

But the final sentence in the article, "I’m sure others could come up with additional requirements that would dissuade prostitution locally" makes me feel less certain of that position.

Should prostitution be legal?

Wednesday, December 25, 2013

Watch those signs...

Was everybody driving carefully last night?

Tuesday, December 24, 2013

What's wrong with court systems?

Kane County, this time.

The Northwest Herald reported on December 24th that Tyrell Sumling, 24, of Carpentersville copped a plea to felony aggravated domestic battery for a five-year sentence in the Illinois Department of Corrections. He must serve 85% of the sentence, but he got credit for 445 days in the Kane County Jail.

FOUR HUNDRED FORTY-FIVE DAYS??? So much for a speedy trial...

How bad a guy is he?

2008 charged with domestic battery; convicted
2010 charged with domestic battery; convicted
2011 charged with domestic battery; convicted
6/19/2012 charged with aggravated domestic battery; convicted

If he's 24 now, then he was, maybe, 19 in 2008, 21 in 2010; 22 in 2011. The judges, probation officers and any parole officers certainly didn't get through to him.

85% of a five-year sentence is 4.25 years, or 4 years 3 months.

Will he be rehabilitated? Or will the severity of his crimes increase?

NWH not reporting Ohlrich lawsuit against MCSD

I did not read anything in the Northwest Herald today about the lawsuit filed yesterday in Federal Court by David Ohlrich of Wonder Lake.

Maybe this is what you might call derogatory news about the McHenry County Sheriff's Department. Sheriff Nygren takes a hit in the lawsuit, when Ohlrich claims, through his attorney, that "The incident alleged in this Complaint was part of a pattern and practice of Defendant NYGREN in failing to properly supervise his officers" (¶ 44) and "Defendant NYGREN, as the official policy maker within the McHenry County Sheriff’s Department, acted with deliberate indifference to the rights of Plaintiff in maintaining, overlooking and preserving the unconstitutional practices, policies and customs delineated above." (¶ 47)

Awww, how can anyone possibly claim that Nygren would act "with deliberate indifference" about anyone's rights?

Deputies must be trained as to what they can do and what they must not do. There are still deputies who claim the entry into the Crystal Lake home of Jerome and Carla Pavlin was lawful, in spite of a judge's ruling that it was not.

In eleven months McHenry County will have a new Sheriff. The time cannot pass quickly enough. Voters must select the candidate who will lead the Department out of the quagmire it's in. Morale must rise, so that employees can view their positions and careers with interest and optimism. Numerous command positions must change.