Sheriff Nygren, of the McHenry County (Ill.) Sheriff's Department (is there another?), has had many opportunities to learn in the past year or so. I wonder what advantage he has taken of them - if any.
He picked battles with a couple of deputies. One he has already completely lost, but he hasn't coughed up the spoils of victory yet.
Another he is very likely to lose in February, and that one will cost him (well, actually, "us") about $200,000.
And now there is another. You can see it coming in the transcript of a Federal Court hearing in Rockford on December 15. Read the transcript at
www.mchenrycountyblog.com/And he certainly picked the wrong battle in September 2009 in the Jewel-Osco parking lot. And now that date is about to become infamous for another reason.
Most likely, Sheriff Nygren has never read
The Art of War or any other writings by Sun-tzu, Chinese general and military strategist (c. 400BC). One of the more famous quotes of Sun-Tzu is "Keep your friends close, and your enemies closer."
A new antagonist of Sheriff Nygren has been put on administrative leave. The next step for the sheriff may be the Merit Commission meeting on January 12 when, I would guess, he will ask the Merit Commission to approve the firing of that deputy. Unless, of course, a Special Meeting is called sooner.
Oh, and recently settled? I heard that Susan O'Grady got $90,000. Case No. 32009CV50012 in Federal Court involved two MCSD deputies and a warrant service that "went south." She was arrested for resisting a peace officer (McHenry County Case No. 08CM000972) in April 2008, and it was thrown out in December 2008. My notes indicate that Deputies Miller and Pena failed to appear in court, and the State (the prosecutors) asked the judge to
nolle prosequi the case; i.e., drop it. The defendant objected - did not want the case dropped. But the judge dropped it, anyway.
(I recall a case on the civil side in McHenry County, where the defendant did not want a case dropped. He wanted his day in court to prove he was not guilty. He didn't get it.)
When two deputies are notified by the State's Attorney's office of a court date and they don't show up, what should happen to them? Why wouldn't they show up? After all, they wouldn't arrest someone if they didn't have good reason. And handle the arrest properly. Right?
Right? So two years and $90,000 later (not counting the legal costs to the Sheriff's Department and County), it's over.
Where was the Sheriff in all this? Why wasn't he yelling at the deputies and demanding to know why they didn't show up in court? And why didn't the judge tell the parties to "have a seat" and make them wait while he sent the bailiff to get the deputies??? (I know, I know... I like the term "bailiff" better than "courtroom security officer".)
Oh, did I mention promotions and advancement?
A good question at MCSD is, "What do I have to do around here to get promoted?"
A lot of the deputies could tell you. Wreck enough patrol cars. Write enough tickets to Hispanics and call them Caucasian. Do what you are told, whether you like it or not (and whether it's right or not).
Remember the couple of seniors near Crystal Lake who were arrested in their home, after a warrant was served on their adult son? It took over a year for criminal charges against them to be dropped. And then they turned around and sued the Sheriff's Department, using a Chicago Loop law firm (smart move). I haven't spoken with them since the day in court when the charges were dropped, and now I hear the Sheriff's Department is about to settle with them. Of course, the Sheriff maintains that his deputies didn't do anything wrong.
Wouldn't it be interesting to see the scorecard of legal costs and settlements run up by MCSD in the past 3-4 years? If we had an investigative newspaper in the County, you'd think they'd sic a reporter on that story. But they should have done
that last September, before the election.